Top 4 Popular CSS Frameworks for Responsive Website Design
11 Nov 2021

According to the definition of the word, "responsive web design," it is a way of web design that tries to develop sites that look fantastic on a number of devices. Responsive web design frameworks are used by the vast majority of IT services organizations today.

It is because frameworks are ready to use and have fewer complications. Additionally, they are delivered as a whole package that includes off-canvas models, which are critical to the web development process.

However, there are several other frameworks available on the market. Have you ever pondered which front-end framework is the best of the best? Alternatively, which UI framework is the most effective?

It is time to take a look at some of the frameworks that are now available for designing flexible websites and that will continue to grow in popularity in the years to come. So, let’s explore more!

4 Best CSS Framework to Ensure the Responsive Website Design

It's also important to realize that frameworks for website responsiveness are just software that has sufficient HTML, CSS, and JavaScript codes to enable responsive web design easy to implement.

It should come as no surprise that CSS frameworks evolved through time and removed a great deal of tension. Due to the fact that designing for several screen sizes has become necessary.

A list of CSS frameworks along with their pros and cons is provided to help you pick the best one for your business site:

1. Foundation

Foundation is a responsive front-end framework developed by ZURB, a product design studio based in Campbell, California. Since 1998, the framework has been used for developing online products and services, which has resulted in the development of this framework and its components.

A lot of customization is possible with Foundation, which is by far the most sophisticated front-end framework for flexible websites on the market. But it is not possible without the assistance of professionals as a layman cannot understand the complexities.

So, you should not take a risk but contact the best web design company Dubai to get a fully-functional and responsive website sooner than later. After all, you need to maintain the online presence of your business.

Foundation Framework Advantages and Disadvantages

Pros

Many people assume that Foundation is a just CSS framework, although this is not the case. It's also a collection of tools that can be used to solve a variety of front-end problems as well.

Foundation has a command-line interface, much to the joy of developers used to working with Webpack or other module bundlers (CLI).

Foundation varies from Bootstrap in that it was created exclusively for front-end developers, allowing those developers to have total control over their user interface. As a result, the rookie will perceive Foundation to be uninspired and intimidating.

Cons

You have a far lower probability of receiving useful advice if you run into troubles while trying anything new since the Foundation community is substantially smaller than the Bootstrap community.

If you're accustomed to something basic, such as Bootstrap, or even worse, pure CSS, Foundation will seem overwhelming at first. Customization opportunities abound thanks to the use of layers and components.

2. Bulma

Bulma is a CSS framework that is built on flexbox. Furthermore, it has a modular structure, which allows you to import just the pieces that you want to utilize in the design of your website. Bulma is a modern grid system based on flexboxes that are easily customized.

Bulma is a CSS framework that is just a few years old but has swiftly established itself as a serious competitor. Bootstrap's attraction for many developers with a design sensibility stems from its strict CSS-only approach. The framework has no JavaScript components, as well as its clean defaults and few configuration options.

Bulma Advantages and Disadvantages

Pros

Bulma currently has almost 3,000 more ratings on Github than Foundations at the time of writing. It goes without saying that the number of stars on Github is not a reliable indicator of quality, but it does demonstrate that Bulma is well-liked by the community.

Bulma has the most straightforward CSS classes of any of the frameworks. When it comes to creating Metro-style grids, tiles are a highly complex yet surprisingly simple technology to use.

Considering Bulma is a small but committed community, it is the best choice if you want to get rid of all the fluff while still developing stunning user interfaces rapidly. Bulma has a section dedicated only to Bootstrap developers to aid them in making the transition.

Cons

Nonetheless, despite its widespread use, it is less well-known than the Foundation model.

Bulma was created to solve the practical, day-to-day challenges that smaller teams and lone developers encounter on a daily basis. However, its applicability is a bit less as compared to other frameworks based on the developer's analysis.  

3. Tailwind CSS

Tailwind's utility-based approach to website development distinguishes it from the competition when it comes to producing mobile-friendly websites. Because of the vast number of utility classes given by this framework, it is possible to create modern websites without having to code CSS.

Keep in mind that using Tailwind CSS involves the use of a development setup in order to decrease the size of the final CSS file generated. Despite this, developers choose Tailwind because of the variety of design styles available out of the box and the simplicity with which HTML components may be modified. This website has a large number of Tailwind UI Kits that can be downloaded.

Tailwind CSS Advantages and Disadvantages    

Pros

However, developers who just use Tailwind (especially on large projects) report being far more productive than those who do not use Tailwind at all.

Tailwind manipulates CSS via the use of JS, making it possible to do some quite complex operations with it. During the creation of the project, the compiler may eliminate all of the unnecessary CSS that was included.

A typical web project would contain the Bootstrap CSS module; in this case, all of Bootstrap's CSS would be included in the final output of the web project.

Cons

Engineers find naming things to be one of the most difficult tasks they have to do. The final output should be labelled to distinguish it from the previous output. Due to the fact that CSS projects sometimes have hundreds (or even thousands) of classes, this becomes an even greater problem.

4. Bootstrap

Bootstrap, a Twitter project, is credited with bringing responsive design into mainstream popularity. In order to encourage the mobile-first mentality, a framework was developed for the first time.

Bootstrap makes designing for smaller displays a simple and painless process for everyone. However, you need to hire a web design agency for the deployment of bootstrap to your website for smoothing functionality and elegance.

Bootstrap pioneered the notion of a grid in order to get responsive design results. Grids are sets of columns on a computer screen that are invisible to the human eye (along with the width). This means that you may arrange three boxes side by side on large screens, but vertically on smaller ones.

Bootstrap Advantages and Disadvantages

Pros

Bootstrap currently has the largest front-end framework ecosystem of any other front-end framework. A startling number of website layouts, themes, administration panels, and UI components have been produced using Bootstrap by developers across the world.

By using Bootstrap, you can rapidly prototype a website without having to concern yourself with CSS positioning or browser compatibility concerns. All that is required to make a website responsive is the creation of HTML code and the addition of CSS classes.

Most of the user interface components you'll ever need are already included in Bootstrap. Today's online experience includes everything from menus to forms to badges to progress bars and alarms to progress bars and alarms to menus and forms. Bootstrap is capable of almost anything.

Cons

Due to the huge library of pre-built components available in Bootstrap, websites that use it tend to seem old and uninspired. Comparing the defaults to the official examples, it is clear that something has been overlooked.

Bootstrap is a framework about which a lot of people have strong feelings. As a result, if you want anything to look or operate differently, you'll have to put in more work since it has its own layout ideas.

The typical CSS screen-width breakpoints, which are as follows: Bootstrap considers a device width of 768 pixels to be a medium-sized screen.

Pick the Best CSS Frameworks for Your Website After Consultation!

Frameworks for responsive web design are essential for every website that requires a responsive design. When it comes to web development, selecting the most appropriate framework is all about satisfying the requirements of the project.

In spite of the fact that there are other frameworks available, Bootstrap remains by far the most popular, followed by Tailwind and Foundation. So, always consult with professionals to pick the best one!